Трамп: "Мы сбросим коррумпированные элиты, вернем страну народу"



Collapse )Collapse )


Кстати, кое-что в этом блоге появляется и раньше, чем на наших новостных лентах
Надеюсь, что и дальше здесь будет оперативно анализироваться информация из Викиликс.

Вот из сегодняшних новостей:

Collapse )


О том, что Клинтон учат искусственным эмоциям я писал ЗДЕСЬ, смотрите пункт 39

Все правильно. Рептилоиды и роботы улыбаться не умеют.




Искусственная Клинтон или "Выборы в США это грязное дело (3)"

Выкладываем третий блок откровений WikiLeaks. Камрад tatzhit ударно пробежался по второй и третьей публикаций от них.

Ниже по большей части - обсуждения пиарщиков. Собственно, это самое интересное для изучения (после почты самой Хиллари), т.к. они часто обсуждают безобразия, которые надо прикрыть, а в остальное время заняты коррупционными делишками со СМИ и политиками.



Начало:
Часть 1
Часть 2


Collapse )

Этот третий блок состоял в основном из 2-3 части опубликованного WikiLeaks, немного из 4-й. Но вот сегодня уже и шестую серию писем выложили. А это значит, что будем продолжать выкладывать блоки материалов из WikiLeaks

Следите, оформляйте подписку))). В русскоязычной сети такого разбора публикаций WikiLeaks я не встречал совсем.

 


О чем нам рассказывает WikiLeaks? или "Выборы в США это грязное дело (2)"

Начиная с 8 октября WikiLeaks начал делиться электронными письмами



Части, когда и в каком составе опубликованы WikiLeaks:

ч.1 - 8 октября, 2060 писем и 170 приложения.
ч.2 - 10 октября, 2086 электронных писем.
ч.3 - 11 октября, 1190 писем.
ч.4 - 12 октября день, 1193 письма.
ч.5 - 12 октября вечер, 673 письма.

С деятельным и бесценным участием камрада tatzhit, проживающего на ТОЙ стороне Лужи (читай - Атлантического океана), РАЗОБРАЛИ некоторые интересные моменты в первой части от 8 октября.

Ниже хотим предложить наш второй материал, в основном по информации второй публикации WikiLeaks, наши апдейты №№ 15-21

На текущий момент также в высокой степени готовности, практически завершен и третий наш блок (апдейты №№ 22-46) по переводу нового списка зашкваров на русский. Она будет гораздо крупнее. Там МНОГО вкусного, будут обсуждения пиарщиков - это самое интересное для изучения (после почты самой Хиллари), т.к. они часто обсуждают безобразия которые надо прикрыть, а в остальное время заняты коррупционными делишками со СМИ и политиками.

Этот третий блок будет все еще в основном из 2-3 части, немного из 4-й. Следите, оформляйте подписку))). В русскоязычной сети такого разбора публикаций WikiLeaks я не встречал совсем.


Collapse )

Возможно, в конце мы узнаем, кто снес Торговые Центры в Нью-Йорке.


История с двумя героинями

Originally posted by mehanik_kb at История с двумя героинями
В конце 2014-начале 2015 гг. всю Корею (преимущественно южную её часть, но и северяне в стороне не остались) всколыхнул громкий скандал. Казалось бы, кого в наши дни удивишь рассказом о туристической поездке? И всё-таки двум женщинам, которых зовут Син Ын Ми и Хван Сон, это удалось. Возмутительницы спокойствия и сами не ожидали такого эффекта. Заплатить за это им пришлось дорого - одна была изгнана с родной земли, другая посидела за решёткой. Больше года я неотрывно следил за этой историей, параллельно изучая биографию Хван Сон, напоминающую роман или киносценарий. Она и станет главной героиней нашего рассказа. Но поскольку поводом для всей этой эпопеи стали Син Ын Ми и её книга, с неё я и начну.
Блаженны изгнанные за правду
Син Ын Ми (신은미), она же Amy Chung по американскому паспорту, родилась 21 июля 1961 г. в Тэгу, в консервативной и очень религиозной (христианской) семье. Воспитывалась в соответствующем духе и до сих пор вспоминает как в школе рисовала на конкурс плакат, изображавший красномордых врагов с рогами и хвостами. После университета она уехала в Америку и работала в колледже учительницей музыки. В настоящее время живёт в Калифорнии.
  В 2011 году её мужу попалась на глаза соответствующая реклама и он предложил съездить в КНДР. "А что, мы не южнокорейские граждане, нам можно". Ын Ми решилась не сразу, но всё же согласилась. Первая же поездка разрушила иллюзии, которые ей внушали с детства. Последовал второй визит, третий, четвёртый... По своим впечатлениям Син Ын Ми написала книгу "Что видела корейская тётя из США в Северной Корее". Это "бедная страна, где живут прекрасные люди" - сформулировала она в предисловии свой вывод.
 Хотя такие слова не назовёшь идейно-правильными с чучхейской точки зрения, Син Ын Ми и её произведение получили тёплые отзывы в северокорейской прессе. Например, её цитировали в журнале "Корея сегодня" № 1 за 2014 г. (стр. 33): "Я проживаю в США. Родилась в консервативной семье и отличаюсь консервативным мировоззрением. Раньше я думала, что на Севере живут черти с рогами и меня туда не тянуло. Но следуя желанию мужа, я провела там 40 туристических дней. Там я почувствовала общность национальных чувств и меня очень тронула искренняя человечность северокорейцев... В интернете я несколько раз писала об этом, а меня сразу нарекли "пособницей Севера", "красной". Если то, что в Северной Корее мы испытали любовь к нации и человечность, означает пособничество, то я с охотой стану таковой".
 Заметили её и на Юге. Она участвовала в одном документальном фильме государственного телевидения, а книга в 2013 г. получила одобрение Минкульта и вошла в список рекомендованной литературы (запомните этот факт - книга настолько аполитична, что не вызвала никаких претензий).

eunmi1
Северокорейская виза Ын Ми.

eunmi2
Среди единоверцев (протестантская церковь в Пхеньяне).

Lee2.jpg
С мужем и юной жительницей Пхеньяна.

eunmi3
Со своей книгой.

Collapse )

Хиллари оскандалилась или "Выборы в США это грязное дело"



Хакнули электронную почту Джона Подесты, пиарщика Хиллари, главу избирательной кампании Хиллари.
Ранее он был главой администрации президента (Chief of Staff, е совсем уверен, совпадают ли там у должности все функции) для Билла.

Много сообщений-емейлов о его сотрудничестве с масс медиа, аля "Передайте Хаиму, что мы очень благодарны за модераторов на этом дебате, они помогли нашему кандидату". Ну и т.п. Все эти сообщения выложены совсем недавно двумя пачками на Викиликс.

Камрад tatzhit любезно подготовил материал, которого еще и близко нет в русскоязычной прессе.


ИТАК. Пока в той переписке найдено:

По планам и политике:

Collapse )


Коррупция внутри партии демократов:

Collapse )


По контролю типа "независимых" СМИ

Collapse )

И т.д. и т.п. и пр. О чем может дорасскажем в следующий раз.

А вот из новостей последнего часа:
13. Дональд Трамп ужаснулся появившейся информации о том, что ряд американских СМИ организовали заговор, чтобы предотвратить его избрание главой Соединённых Штатов.



«Это действительно Америка? Ужасно!», — написал Трамп в своём Twitter.

14. После из очередной выложенной на сайте WikiLeaks части переписки Джона Подесты, главы избирательного штаба кандидата в президенты США от демократов Хиллари Клинтон, хотела покончить с собой бывшая руководитель благотворительного фонда Clinton Foundation Лора Грэм

 

Британская журналистка про Сирию: Белые Шлемы это еще одна попытка легитимизировать террористов

Обсуждение Сирии начинается с 4-00. Самое интересное - с 14:25

От камрада tatzhit



Vanessa Beeley: Белые Шлемы - это попытка США и их союзников создать еще одно “теневое правительство” в Сирии, параллельную правительственную структуру.

Хотя они притворяются что они НКО, что они нейтральны, что они независимы - они получают… около 100 миллионов долларов от США и их союзников. … Сто миллионов долларов - это сумма которая нужна чтобы финансировать армию, а не маленькую НКО.



Мы знаем что они - джихадисты. Есть видео, где они призывают убивать… есть видео, где они действуют в качестве боевиков с оружием, а потом надевают белые шлемы.

Collapse )


Сенатор штата Вирджиния рассказывает неудобную правду о Сирии

Продолжение темы:

Антивоенные активисты США докладывают ООН о поездке в Сирию [RU Voice, ENG in description]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLkn_A7C_4M

Originally posted by chervonec_001 at Экс-сенатор США рассказывает неудобную правду о Сирии



Я рад приветствовать Ричарда Блэка, сенатора штата Вирджиния, отставного полковника морской пехоты, ветерана Вьетнама, и одного из ведущих специалистов по событиям в Сирии (прим. - экс-сенатор лично ездил в Сирию и изучал ситуацию).

В последние недели мы видели окончательный провал переговоров Керри и Лаврова... и таким образом, похоже что конфликт может быть решен чисто военными методами. ... Битва за Алеппо - в некотором роде, Геттигсберг сирийской войны, и победа там сирийско-русско-иранских войск может изменить весь ход конфликта.

Отсутствие какого-либо освещения этих событий в наших СМИ создает некий вакуум и неясность в общественном сознании по поводу того что там происходит. Не могли бы вы дать нам ваш анализ ситуации, ваше мнение о происходящем в Алеппо?



1:50 Ричард Блэк:

Вы знаете, это все потрясающе. Если читать нашу западную прессу, создается впечатление что бои в Алеппо идут между русско-сирийскими войсками, и невооруженным населением города. Силы боевиков вообще, абсолютно не упоминаются.

Collapse )



Terrorism. What is it and why does it happen? - translated from molonlabe

Terrorism. What is it and why does it happen?


Source:

http://molonlabe.livejournal.com/175625.html


Many people are still confused as to what constitutes a terrorist act, and what is considered a “regular crime” (despite the fact that we [in Russia] consider terrorism to be just another criminal offense). Let’s take two definitions of terrorism - Russian and American (I think the US one is more clear, while our definition is primarily worded so that law enforcement agencies can easily classify a given crime):


Ours: "Terrorism is an ideology of violence and the practice of influencing the public, the government bodies, local authorities or international organizations, by use of force, intimidation, and / or other forms violent crimes."

United States: "Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against the civilian population or infrastructure by subnational groups or clandestine international organizations, usually with the aim to influence public opinion."


As we can see, the Americans have a broader interpretation of terrorism.

But did anyone notice either definition including a requirement for the terrorists to make demands, [or pursue a specific short-term goal]? Why are there people, in every discussion in my blog, who believe that if terrorists did not say "we want a ten million USD, [our friends released], and a fully fueled jet," that means the act was not a terrorist attack at all, but rather a common crime? Generally, if terrorists even bother making any demands, those are obviously impractical, and only used as a smokescreen. There is only one goal of a terrorist attack - instilling terror.



I already wrote that fear is a tool for managing society. By the way, the state is also intimidating its citizens, threatening them with criminal prosecution for the commission of any acts it deemed illegal, i.e. achieving control through fear. But there is a difference between the state and the terrorists - the government does not proactively attack innocent people as a warning to others. Roughly speaking, the government is like a big brother who slaps around bullies that attacked his younger sibling, and says: "You touch him again, and you’ll regret it", whereas a terrorist simply murders a random person in the street and shouts: "I will do this every time anyone offends my brother!"


But the broader US definition of "terrorism" does not include one thing which the Russian one has. The word "ideology". If you read carefully, their definition of terrorism is more like a definition of the terrorist attack itself.

<snip>


The Americans do not focus on the ideology, the presumed “foundation of terrorism”. Maybe, this is because US legislators understand the lack of any reasonable and logical reasons for terrorist activities. If we look away from local conflicts, and look at the very ideology of terrorism, we will find that terrorists often operate in the name of totally abstract ideas. "We are on a jihad to establish the word of Allah on the earth!", or "We kill the infidels, because we do not want to live according to the laws of kafir, but want Sharia law". Try to imagine a terrorist group that uses another abstract idea, i.e. "we will commit terrorist acts for the glory of our ancestors, and to enter Valhalla!" or "we kill people - because all world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players." Ridiculous, isn’t it? But the motivations of real terrorists are just as ridiculous.


There are some terrorist organizations that have specific goals, but sooner or later, their activities come to an end. You can fight for a time, but eventually people will realize that it is easier to achieve the same goals through legal and non-terrorist means. IRA is a good example of this.


Thus, terrorism with specific goals is non-viable in the long term. Someone realized this and gave terrorists abstract goals - ones that can never be achieved, and even if it did happen, there would be no way to agree if the goal was reached, and to what extent (i.e. if the kingdom of Allah has been built on Earth).


Perhaps this “meaningless terrorism” is part of a global plan to stop the expansion of Islam. By associating Islam with terrorism in the public mind, all Muslims are made suspicious and undesirable. Perhaps, terrorist fanatics are simply used for specific goals - to destabilize certain countries or regions (Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Lybia, Syria, etc. - ed.). In short, terrorists themselves have no real goals or demands. Terrorism does not exist in order to achieve its officially stated objectives.


However, huge sums of money are invested in terrorist organizations. Nobody will ever invest money simply to have a random guy blow up in a crowd “to further the glory of Allah”. Financial investments are only made in order to get more money later. Especially when we’re talking about the sort of money spent on supporting islamic terrorism.


Do not think that the terrorist attacks are perpetrated for this or that abstract reason, just because the terrorists themselves say so. The triggermen are merely tools, and tools only know what’s needed for their function. The true purpose is only known to the ones who pay for the whole enterprise.

Unholy Alliance: Russia's Pro-Western Opposition Openly Joins Forces With The Far-Right


FOREWORD by Tatzhit


“Exposed: Who Wants To Dismantle Russia?” is a REN TV documentary that uses factual evidence (publicly available video, interviews, or in some cases paparazzi tactics) to expose the recent merger between Russia’s pro-Western neoliberals (Mikhail KASIANOV, his “PARNAS” political party, and their backers like KHODORKOVSKY) and the far-right nationalists/Neo-Nazis.


Of course, this movie is intended to influence the Russian Duma elections, on September 18th, hence its publication on the 9th.


And of course, some of the connections it makes are tenuous. For example, the connection it shows between “PARNAS” and “Firstline” skinheads is that a well-known skinhead was present at their “democratic coalition” meeting, hardly a big deal (although the movie later shows that these skinheads are directly connected to the Russian and Ukrainian hardline nationalists, which are in turn directly connected to PARNAS).


That said, just because the authors want Kasianov to lose the election, doesn’t mean their claims are untrue (heck, after watching this movie, any normal person would want to do everything in their power to keep Kasianov out of Duma).


In fact, I find that the vast majority of the claims in this movie are better researched and presented than e.g. the recent BBC documentary about “Putin’s riches”, which I made fun of in one of my articles (although this speaks more so about the utter degradation of BBC journalism, to the level below much younger and smaller foreign companies).


I wholeheartedly suggest you watch this documentary in Russian, if you speak the language; doubly so if you or anyone you know wants to take part in Russian Duma elections.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-LBzQfuQ5o


If you don’t, I can offer you a synopsis and an English voiceover by yours truly (unfortunately, subtitles for such a large, speech-heavy movie are behind my personal capability at the moment).



SYNOPSIS/TIMELINE:


0:00 Intro - Neo-Nazis unite with Neo-Liberals:



Talking to a Cossack organization that glorifies Nazi collaborators and uses Hitler salutes during Orthodox Christian processions, showing a promotional video of another organization - “Russian National Socialists”, showing footage of young men from Moscow training and fighting in the Ukrainian Neo-Nazi battalion. These men are now united by one more thing - alliance with Mikhail Kasianov and his “PARNAS” political party.


2:12 This Alliance is Nothing Unusual:

Explains how an alliance between hardline nationalists/neo-nazis, and neoliberals, is nothing new during the so-called “color revolutions. Common desire to overthrow the government and seize power always unites radicals - especially since they always have the same masters (neoliberals also marched hand in hand with jihadists during the start of insurrections in Tajikistan, Chechnya, Bosnia, Libya, Syria - for all the same reasons - ed.).




Most recent example is Ukraine, where “democratic opposition” worked hand in hand with the far-right, and even some Tatar and Chechen islamic extremists


https://theintercept.com/2015/02/26/midst-war-ukraine-becomes-gateway-europe-jihad/


4:10 Vyacheslav Malt’sev and “Revolution November 5th”:



Discusses the biography of this nationalist leader, how he rose to power, his connections to the “Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists” (who are e.g. famous for murdering Russian soldiers and civilians during the war in Chechnya), and his calls (which he pretends are merely “predictions”) for a violent overthrow of Russian government.


11:40 Investigation into connections between “PARNAS” and Malt’sev:

Footage and transcript of one of first Kasyanov/Maltsev secret meetings. Mal’tsev insists on a revolution, Kasyanov suggests first getting into Duma and using that position as leverage. Mal’tsev then suggests trying to impeach the president as soon as possible.

That was one of their first meetings. By now, Maltsev is openly a part of PARNAS - one of the top names in its list of candidates (i.e. people who would become MPs if the party gets into Duma - ed.)


13:25 Discussing election fraud in Crimea using Ukrainian nationalist connections

At a secret meeting, Mal’tsev is filmed informing Kasyanov that his Ukrainian nationalist friends can pressure up to 200,000 Crimean Tatars into voting for PARNAS - though the fugitive strongman Dzhemilev (and his radical islamist organization “Hizb Ut Tahrir” -ed.).


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hizb_ut-Tahrir


Mal’tsev  also says that there is potential for taking over entire electoral commissions, by using organized groups of nationalists and islamists, and “doing anything they want” in those districts during elections.



Kasianov expresses surprise and pleasure, saying that he assumed [radical] Tatars refused to obtain Russian passports, but if they have them and their votes can be used, that’s very good. Despite the fact that Kasianov is sharply against Crimean reunification, he apparently has no problem using it for the benefit of PARNAS.


14:55 Another PARNAS leader, Zubov, claims in a speech and in an interview that Crimea (as well as Abkhazia, Transnistria, Ossetia etc.) should be controlled by UN troops. In another interview, he says that it would’ve been better for Russia if Hitler beat Stalin (because Hitler would be beaten eventually, but the English would then make Russia democratic). He also states that Hitler was an “angel in Russian history”, compared to Stalin.


16:20 A politologist and journalist, Kirill Strel’nikov, opines that neoliberals are so fond of the idea of a “revolution” because they realize violence is the only remaining way for them to seize power (e.g. the primaries for the “united democratic opposition” saw about 60,000 voters - this is the neoliberal support base… out of a country of 143.000.000 people - ed.).


17:20 New PARNAS activists - muscular streetfighters promoting the alliance of far-right with pro-Western liberals. One of their leaders - Dmitry Demushkin, known for being part of skinhead gangs earlier and prosecuted for multiple felonies. Now he has quieted down a bit, but still teaches his young followers knife fighting. Kasyanov objected to him working with PARNAS during elections, but Mal’tsev insisted on having Demushkin as his right-hand man, and won.


18:55 Footage of Mal’tsev-Demushkin meeting. They are discussing the advantages that can come from an alliance with the liberals - money, support of Western and pro-Western mass media, etc. At the same time, they discuss how do they explain this sudden ideological about-face to their followers, because people like Kasyanov and Zubov aren’t exactly pictures of racial or ideological purity - and vice-versa, old-time PARNAS followers would be appalled at marching in lockstep with radical nationalists.



They agree that the alliance can be explained away as a situational thing, uniting all anti-Putin forces, etc.They also discuss plans to start riots on November 4th, 2017, and march on Kremlin the next day.

Next they discuss Khodorkovsky’s money. Apparently, Kasyanov told Mal’tsev that Khodorkovsky is delusional, and thinks that, simply because he has money, he can “buy the throne” and become the President.


23:45 (hidden voice recorder?) Discussion between Mal’tsev and the PARNAS unofficial “chief financial officer”, Merzlikin. Malt’sev says that he needs room&board&booze for a dozen or so of his “retainers” when he travels to rallies, but also for roughly 300 followers. Plus loudspeakers, etc.



Mal’tsev says those three hundred activists are the “assault group”, and they have to always be there, ready to act. Merzlikin says that he’ll write everything down for Mal’tsev, and Mal’tsev says that any written evidence could be problematic if they have a run-in with law enforcement, and he’ll just memorize.

They also discuss the need for somebody like Kasyanov or Zubov to publicly come out as one of the leaders of the “Russian March”, to show this neoliberal-nationalist alliance.



26:40 Ravings of Mal’tsev about making lists of the people to be dealt with after revolution, not being afraid of police, threatening a leader of a bike club who spoke against him, etc. Also discusses the fact that Mal’tsev was twice prosecuted for shooting people with firearms firing “traumatic ammo” (rubber bullets), but both cases fell apart.



Attempts to interview Mal’tsev, largely fruitless due to a large number of aggressive bodyguards.


29:25 A piece on modern “Cossack nationalists”, who admire those Tsarist officers who fled to Europe during the Bolshevik revolution, then joined Hitler during invasion of USSR (worth noting that they only managed to form one full Cossack SS division - even though by 1942 Hitler controlled most of historically Cossack lands, whereas enough Cossacks joined the Red Army to form five divisions). Footage from Stanitsa Yelanskaya, where a museum to dedicated to these men is located, and where “Cossack nationalists” assemble - bearing swastikas and Nazi eagles.



Discussion of how Nazi war criminals got their just desserts (throughout the war, Cossack-SS were mostly engaged in punitive operations against Resistance fighters in Yugoslavia, and therefore mostly “fought” civilians  -ed.), when the British handed the surrendered SS-Cossacks to the Soviets in a town of Lienz.



37:55 Introduction to Vladimir Melehov - the man behind the museum of SS-Cossacks, and a monument to their leader Krasnov, in Stanitsa Yelanskaya. Discusses his campaign to build a church in Lienz, commemorating the “tragedy” of SS-Cossacks being handed over to the Soviets (the church was built using his money and that of several European organizations). Ukrainian nationalists attend his conferences - including one of that was recently convicted of murdering Russian soldiers when fighting for islamists in Chechnya. One of Melehov’s close followers is shown fighting in the Maidan coup, filming an address to the leader of the “Right Sector” Dmitrii Yarosh.


40:35 Discussing connections between Vladimir Melehov and Kasyanov, Zubov, PARNAS. A recording of their conversation has Melehov promising to get together his followers for a rally, and Kasyanov and Zubov saying they will come directly to Yelanskaya.

REN-TV journalists interview Vladimir Melekhov, but he says that the monument he built is simply dedicated to “Cossack leadership in general” (now that a plaque commemorating Wehrmacht officer Krasnov has been taken down from it due to court order - ed.), and that he’s simply supporting PARNAS as a private citizen.


43:30 Discusses the involvement of Melehov in ecological protests against nickel mining near Hoper river, and how a protest that was initially peaceful and focused on safeguarding ecology from a private company was quickly radicalized and transformed into a political, anti-government protest by various “activists”, with Melehov as one of the leaders.

A different kind of Cossack, Evgenii Galustov - one of the Cossacks that worked with law enforcement against the riots - says that the technology used there was exactly the same as the recipe used during Maidan.


46:35 Another recorded Melehov-Kasyanov conversation. Melehov promised to form “groups” that could “monitor elections” and do “other things” in a number of major cities. Melehov asks if PARNAS (and their “friends” in pro-Western media) will support his activists if they get arrested during their election-day activities. Kasyanov says that he has to be sure that these are not random people, but people PARNAS trusts and agrees with. If so - then yes, they will be supported fully.


48:40 History piece - Melehov built a monument to the SS officer Krasnov on the site that used to be Soviet trenches in 1942, in the area where 40 thousand people fought and died to stop the Nazis.


49:50 Connection between neoliberals and skinheads, modern Neo-Nazis.

Connection is tenuous (see FOREWORD). However, they are closely connected to Mal’tsev and Demushkin, who are now part of PARNAS.



Also mentions a sex tape of Kasyanov and his aide Pelevina (Tape not presented in full, but was a big deal about half a year ago, due to the following: 1. Kasyanov is supposedly “happily married” 2. On tape, he promises to make his paramour an MP 3. They speak very unkindly of their closest political allies Navalny (“fucking Nazi”) and Yashin (“piece of crap”) - the latter is also blamed for not giving up his mandate for $30 thousand, like agreed 4. Discussed Kasyanov’s stealing in the 90s


http://perebezhchik.ru/slukhi/4161.html )


55:15 Oleg Matveichev, an economics professor, and a famous blogger, also discusses the current neo-liberal and neo-nazi alliance.

Discussing the history of Ukrainian “Maidan” revolution, how gullible people were duped into believing they can make the country better, how the protest gradually moved from a peaceful and optimistic event to nationalist fighters attacking police, to murders, to mass murders by unknown snipers.

Viktoriya Shilova, former top aide to key Ukrainian politician Oleg Lyashko, says that revolution was hijacked and they were used as a tool for a different gang of thieves to seize power


1:03:50 Alexander Rar, German journalist, says that it’s a very simple, very believable, and very wrong idea that you can simply overthrow the constitutional government and become prosperous



1:04:30 Ukrainian, “Maidan” scenario is the wet dream both of pro-Western neoliberals and the far-right in Russia. They are doing their best to prepare for it and make it happen.



Real liberals are afraid of this radicalization, and these unsavory bedfellows. One of the top PARNAS leaders, Ilya Yashin, is shown speaking publicly against Maltsev, the “crazy anti-Semite and conspiracy theorist”. Kasyanov cuts him off, but Yashin insists.


Another long-time PARNAS leader, Vladimir Molokin (head of PARNAS for Bashkortostan region), declares that he is leaving the party because of these developments.


1:07:40 Mal’tsev says, on national TV, that their alliance has one goal - impeach Putin. Mark Galperin, a long-time liberal political activist, and a classic member of “intelligentsia”,  is now saying that they can only come to power through violence, and they need to start attacking law enforcement officers.

“None of these people are offering a real economic or political solution - the only thing they care about it seizing power by force.”



VIDEO WITH VOICEOVER



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnDxSyKjvIo